Lishuan lee dating Web chat online sex german
However, in the case of situations mentioned for the first time or of problems, the origins or the manifestations of which go back a number of years, he has sometimes made use of earlier information and referred to it.The information gathered is also used specifically to document religious intolerance.MANDATE AND WORKING METHODS OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR II. The choice of the above-mentioned countries was determined by the Special Rapporteur's concern to study in detail a number of problems of religious intolerance which had been brought to his attention, while maintaining an appropriate geographical balance.SPECIFIC INCIDENTS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES EXAJ4INED BY THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR 8 Afghanistan . The Special Rapporteur recalls his wish to visit the Governments of India, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Sudan and is still awaiting their replies. Conclusions and recommendations 131 Appendix 1 - Members of religious orders subject to various restrictions Appendix 2 - Reply from the Chinese authorities IV. Questionnaire addressed to Governments and relating to freedom of religion and belief in primary and secondary schools E/CN. At its forty-second session, the Commission on Human Rights decided, in resolution 1986/20 of 10 March 1986, to appoint for one year a special rapporteur to examine incidents and governmental actions in all parts of the world inconsistent with the provisions of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, and to recommend remedial measures for such situations. In accordance with the terms of that resolution, the Special Rapporteur submitted his first report to the Commission at its forty-third session (E/c N.4/1987/35). Implementation of legislation and policy on tolerance and non-discrimination based on religion or belief 118 E.However, the visit was postponed to a more convenient date.The Government of Pakistan, in a letter of 15 February 1994, agreed to a visit by the Special Rapporteur, but has still not confirmed the dates of the visit.
In accordance with his mandate, and in application of paragraph 14 of resolution 1994/18, in which the Commission encourages the Special Rapporteur to examine the contribution that education can make to the more effective promotion of religious tolerance, he has undertaken consultations with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the International Bureau of Education (l EE) with a view to benefiting from their experience and expertise in this field and exchanging views.
In order to do so, he has drawn on a very broad range of governmental and non-governmental sources, of very varied geographical origins, and comprising both organizations and individuals.
He has also spoken with the representatives of some Governments and a number of non-governmental organizations.
In some cases, having been notified in good time of serious allegations, concerning amongst others harassment, arbitrary detention and attempts on people's lives, the Special Rapporteur decided to resort to the urgent appeal procedure (see chap. The Special Rapporteur is particularly grateful for the efforts of those Governments which attempted to shed light on the allegations submitted to them, in accordance with the wish expressed by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 1994/53, to the effect that Governments should respond “expeditiously to requests for information made to them through the procedures, so that the thematic special rapporteurs concerned . The Special Rapporteur will also in future apply himself to studying the question of Governments which do not furnish replies to the allegations transmitted to them, a problem to which he wishes to call the Commission's attention.
These questions were in many cases accompanied by requests for legislative and other relevant texts. As for the follow-up to allegations communicated to Governments and the replies received from them, the Special Rapporteur has reported his views and observations and has reverted to specific situations whenever the problems and manifestations of religious intolerance so required, or as long as Government replies - or the lack of them - failed to provide the necessary clarification.